We need to rethink ... a lot of stuff

Was watching a video on Jeremiah Owyang's site, and it ended with a statement that we "need to rethink copyright, authorship, identity...ethics..."  That's pretty much what I've been doing for several years now and have only, in the past 12 months, started to put into practice.


The assumptions are always there.  "That's not journalism." "That's not ethical." "You don't ask the tough questions."  So I've started at the end and begun asking the tough questions.  What is journalism?  What is Ethics?  What is a tough question?

Not getting a lot of real answers.  What I'm starting to find out is, in the midst of this very real sea change in how information is disseminated, parsed, consumed and created, we have assumptions, not answers.  Journalists have relied on the advertising departments of publications to insulate them from the decision processes that make up their ethics.  The mechanism that supports journalism has become the definition or journalism.  The tough questions are defined by whoever is not doing the asking.

But the mechanisms, shields and assumptions are falling apart right now.  It's up to the individual now to do their own thinking; to define and maintain their own ethics; to be ready to ask a tough question when you think it isn't being asked, rather than denigrate someone else's effort.

We are all on this planet together and no one is getting out alive.  We are the government, we are the ethical construct, we are the machine.  If you don't like the way it's working, stop complaining and do something about it.

Comments

  1. Brian FullerJune 17, 2008 at 7:48 AM

    Before I weigh in at length here, nice new background Lou!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mike MitchellJuly 3, 2008 at 9:01 PM

    Lou,

    You probably don't remember a 13 hour trip to the L.A. area to visit George's folks house and meet his family and Kathy, but if you do, you might remember me in the back sleeping as much as possible!

    Also, if the White Salmon Enterprise rings a bell, great! The New York Times and what you've done since certainly outshines that! Great not to be stuck in Lodi again, I bet!

    Very pleased to have come across you after all these years - hope all remains well.

    -mike mitchell

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lou CoveyJuly 6, 2008 at 1:11 PM

    For all my readers, Mike Mitchell is a college roommate that I lost track of about 30 years ago. Nice to hear from you Mike.

    You still owe me 20 bucks.

    Call me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Paul StewartJuly 9, 2008 at 8:14 AM

    Mike,

    Don't know if you remember me, but I had the pleasure of dining on a sumptuous repast of chicken necks and rice fastidiously prepared by you as I was visting Lou, et. al. the Lanai(?) residence one evening. Nice to see you're doing well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. George PhillipsJuly 15, 2008 at 11:09 AM

    The chicken necks and rice were made possible by us selling plasma (not quite blood, but close) to earn beer money that semester.

    Good to hear from you Mike.

    George

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm old and you are not. That's good thing.

Image
I turned 64 this year and have been on the receiving end of scams and offers related to social security, dementia and Medicare for weeks now. I'm also getting offered senior discounts without asking. None of that has bothered me as much as getting dismissed because I'm no longer in my 30s (which bothered me as much when I was in my 20s). Today, however I had a revelation and I'm feeling much better about my age. I was doing a session with the marketing team for a small business back by telephone and was in the process of breaking down their preconceived notions about communication when the youngest member of the team asked me, "How do you know this is what our customers are thinking?" "Because I've been doing this for 40 years," I replied. "Oh." She replied.  Then one of the business owners, well into his 70s asks, "Wait a minute. You said you've been doing this fo r 40 years. How old are you?" "I'm 64....
Read more

Speaking of ethics in sponsored content...

Image
An article today in Forbes on ethics in sponsored content  brought back memories of our recent discussions regarding UBM Tech's methodology changes and the larger discussion about whether corporations can be expected to deliver ethical content. The article points out that Edelman has posted their own set of ethics regarding sponsored content that remarkably mirrors Footwasher Media's position:  That it isn't PR or advertising.  It's something different from what most corporate advocates practice and it must be, by nature, ethical or it loses all value. Many people in the news business have taken ethical standards for granted.  They seem to believe that they are intertwined with the genesis of journalism itself.  It isn't true.  The news business, supported by advertising began in the 1700s with Benjamin Franklin's founding of the Pennsylvania Gazette , but the separation of advertising from editorial did not appear until th...
Read more

Why you don't (or do) like social media, Part Three

Image
When you boil down attitudes toward and execution of social media practices, it's all about leadership.  Real leadership, not the popular definition that rises from the horrific misinterpretation  of Geoffrey Moore's book, Crossing the Chasm .  Let me explain that reference a bit more in depth first. Moore stated fairly simply that for a technology company to be successful, it must attain the perception of leadership in a market niche.  The misinterpretation of that concept is what screws up the marketing for so many companies.  Moore's statement was an indicator of success and a strategy, not a tactic.  If you are the perceived market niche leader, Moore explains, THEN you know you successfully crossed the chasm.  Therefore your marketing strategy must revolve around developing the perception of leadership.  However, most companies believe that saying you are a leader in your marketing documents, even when you are clearl...
Read more